Financial reports/Quebec Programs 2012
| Cette page est rédigée en anglais seulement et doit être traduite en français. |
Please note that this report is only a draft for Quebec program grant 2012. See also MetaWikipedia:Grants:WM CA/Quebec Programs 2012
Compliance and completion
[edit]- Did you comply with the requirements specified by WMF in the grant agreement?
- Answer YES or NO.
- YES
- Is your project completed?
- Answer YES or NO.
- YES
- Did you use any of the grant funds?
- Answer YES or NO.
- YES
Activities and lessons learned
[edit]This section describes what the grantee did, and what the grantee learned from implementing the project. This section should be useful to others implementing similar projects and is an opportunity for the grantee to reflect on the project's performance.
Activities
[edit]- Provide a detailed list of activities performed to complete this project, descriptions of these activities, and the amount of time spent on each activity. This section should also include a list of participants, or a link to pictures, blog posts, or videos from the project or event.
Contribution Day
[edit]
- Description
- A Contribution Day is one of the Quebec Committee event where Wikipedia editors gather in order to significantly contribute on an article and to fraternize with local Wikipedians and ultimately recruit new editors.
- Dates
- 18 February 2012 (10h - 17h).
- Participants
- Asclepias, Benoit Rochon, Boréal, Cantons-de-l'Est, ChristianT, Cortomaltais, Fralambert, Letartean, Seeris, Simon Villeneuve.
- Summary
- All day on February 18, 2012, a dozen of the most active contributors of French Wikipedia gathered in a room of the Université Laval and improved the article w:fr:Jean Talon. Participants divided tasks:
- researchers: collect books, find the passages of interest, add sources and references, etc.
- editors: write the encyclopedic text, build the bibliography, etc.
- media: find free illustrations, high quality scanning, upload to Commons, etc.
- Results
-
- Twelve local Wikipedians met for the first time.
- 103 edits on French Wikipedia during the day [1];
- 22 edits during subsequent days [2];
- 63 edits on English Wikipedia during subsequent days [3];
- 10 free and high quality illustrations have been scanned and uploaded to Commons. [4]
- Several articles and projects relevant to Jean Talon have benefited from this Contribution Day: 国王の娘たち, Monnaie de carte, Ursulines de Québec, François de Montmorency-Laval, Pierre Le Moyne, Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Marguerite Bourgeoys[5][6][7]..., Wikisource[8][9], etc. And countless other projects in multiple languages.
- Links
International Scientific Conference on ICT and Education
[edit]
- Description
- Organized by the Interuniversity Research Centre on training and the teaching profession (CRIFPE), International Scientific Conference on ICT and Education brought together over 600 participants from 30 countries and encompassed nearly 250 presentations and workshops as well as many commercial exhibitors.
- Time frame
- May 3 and 4, 2012.
- Participants
- Benoit Rochon, Simon Villeneuve, Antoine Letarte.
- Summary
- Two founding members of the Quebec Committee, a working group of Wikimedia Canada for French-speaking contributors, gave a 40 minutes presentation to an audience of teachers and other stakeholders interested in the use of ICT in education. In response to online training given by Simon Villeneuve under the APOP and personal experience lived by Antoine Letarte and Simon Villeneuve in using Wikipedia in their own classroom, both teachers gave a lecture to explain how to efficiently use Wikipedia with students in a class. Both teachers also presented their educational projects on Wikipedia. A video was produced and is now available under a free license on Commons.
- Results
- Firstly, the people attending the conference, mostly teachers interested in Wikipedia were grateful for the work done by Wikipedians and the Wikimedia Foundation. During the question period, several stakeholders indicated that their students used Wikipedia extensively for their work and the teachers were happy to demystify the functioning of the collaborative encyclopedia. Then the CRIFPE exceptionally agreed to put the video of the conference under a free license for free and add us to their "Gold Partners". During the year 2012, we have seen several educational projects emerge across Quebec initiated by teachers who attended the conference.
- Links
-
- "Utiliser Wikipédia en pédagogie" (work page from the speakers)
- Utiliser Wikipédia en pédagogie.pdf (presentation slides)
- Wikipédia et les TIC en éducation.ogv (video of the presentation)
- Photo gallery on Commons
- Summary of the presentation.
- Conference program (see page 23)
- International Scientific Conference on ICT and Education
- Gold Partners of the conference at no cost.
Forum mondial de la langue française
[edit]
- Description
- In 2010, during the 13th Sommet de la francophonie (Francophonie Summit) held in Montreux, Switzerland it was decided that a Global Forum of the French language should be established. The first forum was held in Quebec City in 2012 and it was an unique opportunity for Wikimedia Canada and Wikimedia France to hold a workshop and a conference about Wikimedia projects together. It was the first time that people speaking French from around the World met to exchange on the French language.
- Time frame
- From July 2 to July 6, 2012
- Participants
- Adrienne Alix, Simon Villeneuve, Antoine Letarte, Olier Raby.
- Summary
- Antoine Letarte from Quebec Committee and Adrienne Alix from Wikimedia France were invited on a panel to speak about the state of Wikipedia in French. Simon Villeneuve, a Quebec Committee member, was invited to another panel. Cantons-de-l'Est was also at the stand. All the four answered visitors questions and gave very short introduction to Wikipedia to many people at the stand: how to contribute, what is Wikipedia, etc. During the two panels, topics discussed were:
- What are the barriers to the accessibility of digitized knowledge in your area or industry?
- The development of digital technology has enabled it to reduce delays experienced by some groups in your region in access to knowledge or not, he put more focus on the problems of access to knowledge which existed (maintenance or widening gap of the digital divide).
- Can we speak of a north-south equity in accessibility?
- How to ensure equitable manner to democratize learning in the digital age?
- What are two or three solutions implemented by governments and institutions of the Francophonie to address the main problems identified?
- Results
- In addition to the representation of Wikimedia Canada at this major and global forum was important, we were able to meet people from many countries and from all disciplines. We were also able to explain Wikimedia projects goals and how it works to many visitors at the stand, but also within two different panels in relation with education. It was also a great opportunity to meet people from Wikimedia France and talk about future collaborations. Antoine Letarte also gave an interview to Radio-Canada (CBC in French) and Wikimedia Canada had an opportunity to talk about francophone projects and talk about Wikipedia on national radio.
- Links
Wikipedia Takes Quebec City
[edit]
- Description
- Wikipedia Takes Quebec City was the first Wikipedia Takes Your City event organized in Canada. Such events have the goal to gather photographs to increase the local content available on Commons about a particular city or region.
- Time frame
- June 16, 2012 (9 h to 18 h).
- Participants
- 35 local photographs and Quebec Committee members.
- Summary
- On June 16, people from Quebec City gathered for the Wikipedia Takes Quebec City competition. Organized by the Quebec Committee, the contest took place at the Cégep Limoilou in downtown Quebec City. 30 people went all around the capital city to take quality and useful pictures. On a perfect day for photography, participants took over 5,000 pictures of which 1,071 were uploaded on Commons after a selection by the users. The competition was aimed more at quality images than at quantity of images illustrating things on a list. The winners were selected in the summer and were announced by the end of August. It was particularly hard to choose a winning picture and portfolio because of the great quality of the images taken by the participants. Two great winners were declared in two categories: best picture and best portfolio and each won an iPad. Also, two runnerups received prizes for their uploads of the second and third best pictures.
- Results
- The event was a success on many levels. First, many participants from the competition became regular Commons users. In particular, users Mcturcotte and Malimage are now active uploaders and contributors on Commons and French Wikipedia. Second, the event received a good media coverage in the regional medias and helped build bridges with many people in the Quebec City community (Cégep Limoilou, local antenna of Radio-Canada, other media partners such as Le Soleil and Vox, local tourism bureau, etc). Participants were informed of the existence of the competition by different means, suggesting a good communication strategy. Also, the contest was innovative in its ways. Users uploaded the pictures on Commons themselves, giving them a great opportunity to be initiated to Wikimedia projects. A conference about free-licenced photography was also given in the morning to all participants. Finally, Commons received a very nice set of free-licenced images about Quebec City and its surroundings. Some images received the Quality Image status on Commons.
-
One of the runnerups -
Second runnerup -
Letartean giving a presentation before the contest -
Benoit Rochon showing participants how to upload pictures on Commons -
Slides from the presentation given in Washington during Wikimania 2012
Wiki Loves Monuments in Canada
[edit]
- Description
- Wiki Loves Monuments is the largest photo competition in the World. It brings many pictures of historical monuments and heritage sites from around the World to Commons for free reuse.
- Time frame
- September 2012
- Participants
- 395 photographers, and organizers
- Summary
- During the summer of 2012, Wikipedians have prepared lists of historic places in Canada (English) and Liste des lieux patrimoniaux du Canada (French) for Canada's participation in Wiki Loves Monuments. During the entire month of September, amateur photographers could upload their images of historic sites recognized by the Canadian government and thus enlarge the free licensed image collection on Wikimedia Commons about Canada.
- Results
- Within few weeks, we got over 5,500 photos of Canada related to the country's history, 395 participants, in addition to promoting the free media repertoire, Wikimedia Commons, and other Wikimedia projects as well as Wikimedia Canada.
- Links
- Top 10 finalists
-
Notre-Dame-de-Bon-Secours Chapel - Marguerite-Bourgeoys Museum, Montreal, Quebec.
First place: 594.5 points. First canadian prize and goes to the international jury for the 2nd round.
Photographer: Jazmin Million -
Québec Bridge National Historic Site of Canada, Quebec City, Quebec.
Second place: 593.5 points. Second canadian prize and goes to the international jury for the 2nd round.
Photographer: Canonnica -
The bank street bridge over the Rideau Canal, Ottawa, Ontario.
Third place: 593 points. Third canadian prize and goes to the international jury for the 2nd round.
Photographer: Gregvgregv -
Freeport Bridge, Kitchener, Ontario.
Fourth place: 569 points. Finalist goes to the international jury for the 2nd round.
Photographer: Ian Furst -
Montreal Clock Tower, Montreal, Quebec.
Fifth place: 565 points. Finalist goes to the international jury for the 2nd round.
Photographer: Michael Vesia -
Halifax Public Gardens National Historic Site of Canada, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Sixth place: 557.5 points. Finalist goes to the international jury for the 2nd round.
Photographer: Markjt -
Old Skeena Bridge, Terrace, British Columbia.
Seventh place: 555 points. Finalist goes to the international jury for the 2nd round.
Photographer: Chasehamilton2012 -
Former Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa, Ontario.
Eighth place: 550 points. Finalist goes to the international jury for the 2nd round.
Photographer: Murckraker -
Cabot Tower, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador.
Ninth place: 543.5 points. Finalist goes to the international jury for the 2nd round.
Photographer: William Zimmerly -
Orpheum Theatre National Historic Site of Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Tenth place: 542.5 points. Finalist goes to the international jury for the 2nd round.
Photographer: MichaelThoeny
![[8]](https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Fiches_Jean_Talon_recensement.jpg){kind=link}
Lessons learned
[edit]- What lessons were learned that may help others succeed in similar projects? Consider the following questions and respond with 1 - 2 paragraphs.
-
- What went well?
- Contribution day is a really great activity that bring local wikipedians to work together IRL; old disputes are erased afterwords. We did few other days like this, and we decide to invite also outsiders that don't know Wikipedia, so with a little training, we recruit more voluteers; newcomers are always very motivated, it's fun to see!
- At the International Scientific Conference on ICT and Education, teachers were thanking us to make Wikipedia work so well, and also help them to understand how it works. We use a powerpoint that we create based on recurent questions. We were very surprised by their openness.
- Forum mondial de la langue française, we didn't expect that it would be that big with so many people from all horisons. We had tables with computers to introduce Wikipedia to participants. We noted that many Africans were very interested in Wikipedia. The collaboration with Wikimedia France helped to bridge with the project participants and Afripedia. Those meetings are very useful for the Wikimedia movement.
- Wikipedia Takes Quebec City, first introduce Commons to photograph amateurs. We decide to invite photos clubs instead of random people, so the quality of pictures were much more higher than any other photo event we organize in the past. We also notice that prizes were not that important for them, because only the fact that they were doing this for Wikipedia (Commons) was a great feeling.
- For Wiki Loves Monuments in Canada we were glad to bring Canadians on Flickr to participate, even if it was more work. The best pictures came from Flickr, and that gave us the opportunity to talk about free licence to photographers.
- What did not go well?
- During the Contribution day, we were working on an article and tried to make it featured, but it is too ambicious. Twelve people on the same item causing conflicts editing, we had to work on different sections.
- At the International Scientific Conference on ICT and Education, we didn't planned so many questions for the teachers, we should have make more room for this, at least 45 minutes. Also, the Conference organizers place us at the end of the afternoon, so there was not as many people than in the morning.
- At the Forum mondial de la langue française, evreything went pretty well; many if more wikipedians could be there it would have help others to go for lunch, etc. People had to stay at their positions all day for four days.
- Wikipedia Takes Quebec City was well done, but we should have use more Twitter/Facebook; we sent a lot of press releases but that was not enough. Also, after the scavenger hunt, we can't ask people to upload their pictures on the spot; the best is to show them once with a projector, and they can do it themselves at home afterwards. Relatively speaking, the cost paid to acquire new photos was relatively high when you divide the execution cost by the number of new pictures.
- Wiki Loves Monuments in Canada was organised by international team, but I have a good suggestion for others: don't organise this alone, a country should at least have between 3 and 5 wikipedians to organise this.
- What would you do differently if you planned a similar project?
- For the next Contribution days, we will partner with organizations. For example, at the Day of Mile End, we contacted the historical society of Mile End and employees of the library where we were doing the event. The result is that we had some new contributors who could find sources easily, others who knew the story of the Mile End and we created a lot of links with the community of free culture and the library network. So for future Contribution days, we will always find an association related to our theme, because we no longer work on only one article, but several articles around a theme.
- It is unclear how likely the event participants are to become long term contributors of the Wikimedia movement. Future events should put a priority on developing the volunteer base over creating content. This should be discussed at a future chapter strategic planning session and the ideas integrated into future events.
Project goal and measures of success
[edit]This section should reference the project goals and measures of success described in the approved grant submission. See Grants:Financial reports to review the goals and metrics listed in the approved submission.
Project goal
[edit]- Provide the project goal here.
- To recruit new volunteers and promote development of content in the province of Quebec, Canada for the Wikimedia movement.
- Promote awareness of the Wikimedia Canada chapter and its commitment to support French language culture.
- Present Wikimedia Canada as an accessible chapter to Quebec residents.
- Increase photo and video about Canada available on Commons.
- Gain access to Canadian classrooms by recruiting leaders in the education community.
- Did you achieve your project goal? How do you know your goal was achieved? Please answer in 1 - 2 paragraphs.
- Yes, please see "Results" section for each event described above.
Measures of success
[edit]- List the measures of success exactly as provided in the approved grant submission, and evaluate your project according to each measure listed there.
- Feedback from the audience about the presentations. (Antoine for WP Takes Quebec and others to speak about the engagement activities and audience interaction.)
- Contact with more francophone community participants. (Members of QC Group should be consulted)
- Progress towards a program for movement content in the classroom. (Ask Quebec members if this impact was realized)
- Accumulation of volunteers for francophone activities.
- Engaged with over 400 people in the community, conversion rates to long term contributors or WMCA volunteers are still unknown.
- Increased movement GLAM content.
- Over 6000 culturally significant photographs contributed to Wikimedia Commons
Progress towards implementing QRPedia in Montreal- Program component not executed
- Provide an overall assessment of how your project went according to these measures.
- The Wikimedia movement, as a community orientated organization, has become better known in Quebec.
- Increased awareness of the organization has improved our credibility and opened doors with external organizations in Quebec.
- Some new volunteers were acquired through engaging the public and awarding the prizes.
- The content of Canadian monuments on Wikimedia Commons was significantly expanded and improved through the upload of 5,500 images as a direct result of these activities. And for Wikipedia Takes Quebec City participants upload over 1,000 pictures of Quebec city.
- Around 35% of the participants to these two photo contests kept on uploading afterwards.
Impact
[edit]This section ties this project to Wikimedia's broader goals, and shows what the project accomplished.
- What impact did this project have on WMF's mission and the strategic goals? Please answer in 1 -2 paragraphs and include specific measures of impact such as the number of readers or editors reached by a particular project, or the number of articles edited or improved.
-
- Stabilize infrastructure
- Increase participation
- Improve quality
- Increase reach
- Encourage innovation
Reporting and documentation of expenditures
[edit]| Description | Budget | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| Transportation | $300 | $122 |
| Per diem meals | $150 | $119 |
| Lodging | $200 | - |
| Other | - | $199 |
| Total | $650 | $440 |
| Description | Budget | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| Transportation | $350 | $434 |
| Per diem meals | $1,250 | $552 |
| Lodging | $650 | $109 |
| Total | $2,250 | $1,095 |
| Description | Budget | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| Transportation | $350 | $516 |
| Lunch | $75 | $118 |
| Other | - | $8 |
| Total | $425 | $642 |
| Description | Budget | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| Prizes total amount | $2,000 | $1,174 |
| Total | $2,000 | $1,174 |
| Description | Budget | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| Transportation | $300 | $69 |
| Per diem meals | $150 | - |
| Hall + security guard 8 hours | $500 | $616 |
| Prizes total amount | $2,000 | $1,882 |
| Other | - | $710 |
| Total | $2,950 | $3,278 |
| Description | Budget | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| Material for labels | $150 | - |
| Transportation | $100 | - |
| Total | $250 | - |
| Description | Budget | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Total | $8,525 | $6,628 |
| Surplus (Shortfall) | $1,897 |
This section describes the grant's use of funds
Documentation
[edit]- Did you send documentation of all expenses paid with grant funds to grants at wikimedia dot org, according to the guidelines here? Answer "Yes" or "No".
- Will do so shortly.
Expenses
[edit]- Please list all project expenses in a table here, with descriptions and dates. Review the instructions here.
- These expenses should be listed in the same format as the budget table in your approved submission so that anyone reading this report may be able to easily compare budgeted vs. actual expenses.
- Note that variances in the project budget over 10% per expense category must be approved in advance by WMF Grants Program staff. For all other variances, please provide an explanation in the table below.
Please see financials chart above, which details budgeted versus actual results by category and event.
- Total project budget (from your approved grant submission)
- $8,525 CAD
- Total amount requested from WMF (from your approved grant submission, this total will be the same as the total project budget if the WMF grant is your only funding source)
- $8,525 CAD
- Total amount spent on this project (this total should be the total calculated from the table above)
- $6,628 CAD
- Total amount of WMF grant funds spent on this project (this total will be the same as the total amount spent if the WMF grant is your only funding source)
- $6,628 CAD
- Are there additional sources of revenue that funded any part of this project? List them here.
- No
Remaining funds
[edit]- Are there any grant funds remaining?
- Answer YES or NO.
- Yes (surplus is shown in financials table above)
- Please list the total amount (specify currency) remaining here. (This is the amount you did not use, or the amount you still have after completing your grant.)
- $1,897 CAD
- If funds are remaining they must be returned to WMF, reallocated to mission-aligned activities, or applied to another approved grant.
- Please state here if you intend to return unused funds to WMF, submit a request for reallocation, or submit a new grant request, and then follow the instructions on your approved grant submission.
- Return unused funds